|
CHIEF: Alastair Ivor Gilbert Boyd 7th Baron Kilmarnock |
Richard G. and Jerri Lynn Boyd 568 W. Friedrich Street Rogers City, Mich. 49779 Contact Us:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Battle of
Culloden Archibald M'Kay, 1864
(picture of the 1st Earl of Kilmarnock owned by Susan Gillim family) An anecdote in connection with the battle of Falkirk is told of the Earl's lady. She was then residing at Callander House, in the vicinity; and, in order to divert the attention of Lieutenant-General Hawley, the commander of the King's troops, from the movements of the Prince, she insidiously invited him to breakfast. This well-laid scheme was in some degree successful; for Hawley was so fascinated by the elegant appearance and engaging demeanour of the Countess, that he passed several hours in her company, during which time Charles found ample opportunity for choosing, as he did, a favourable position for his army. In short, the general had so far forgot his duty, that he had ultimately to be apprised of the situation of the enemy by a messenger, who was despatched to him for that purpose; and such, it is said, was his confusion of mind when leaving the mansion, that he left his hat behind him, and Gilpin-like, hurried bareheaded to the camp. (2) The battle of Falkirk, in which the young adventurer was victorious, was fought on the afternoon of the 17th of January, 1746.
In the course of a few days Prince
Charles and his followers marched to Stirling, and, after a fruitless
attempt to besiege the Castle, retreat- ed to the north. By this time the
Duke of Cumberland had arrived in Scotland with additional forces for
the supression of the Rebellion, and the day was rapidly approaching
when the golden hopes of the Prince and his adherants were destined to
perish. The Duke
"There was no lack of bravery there, (1). The author of the memoir from which we have already quoted, says he "was received by the young Chevalier with great marks of esteem and distinction, was made Colonel of the Guards, and promoted to the degree of a General." (2). See Chamber's Rebellion The following powerful description of
the last charge of the Highlanders we quote from Chamberlain's interesting History of The
Rebellion: "Notwithstanding that the three files of the front line
of the English poured forth their incessant fire of musketry--- notwithstanding that the cannon, now loaded with grapeshot, swept the
field as with a hail-storm---notwithstanding the flank fire of Wolfe's regiment---onward, onward went the headlong Highlanders, It was a moment of dreadful, agonizing
suspense, but only a moment; for the whirlwind does not reap the forest with a greater rapidity
than the Highlanders cleared the line. They swept through and over that frail barrier almost as easily and instantaneously as the
bounding calvacade brushes through the morning labours of the gossamer which stretch across its path; no, however, with the same
unconsciousness of the event. Almost every man in their front rank, "When the first line had been completely swept aside, the assailants continued their impetuous advance till they came near the second, when, being almost annihilated by a profuse and well-directed fire, the shattered remains of what had been but an hour before a numerous and confident force, at last submitted to destiny by giving away and flying. Still a few rushed on, resolved rather to die than thus forfeit their well-acquired and dearly estimated honour. They rushed on, but not a man ever came in contact with the enemy. The last survivor perished as he reached the points of the bayonets." According to various historians, the
havoc which was made among the poor Highlanders, at the close of the battle, was dreadful in the
extreme. In some places of the field their bodies lay in layers three or four deep; and many of the survivors were treated with the
greatest inhumanity by the reckless soldiers of the Duke.(1) Many of the vanquished, who escaped death on the field of battle, were taken
prisoners, among whom was the Earl of Kilmarnock, who, according to the Culloden Papers, had received a wound in the engagement. In the
confusion of the fight, or by the wind---for the weather was
tempestuous--- his hat had fallen from his head, and he was escorted bareheaded along the lines of the royal army. His eldest son, who was
an ensign in the King's service at the same combat, with feelings of pity and affection beheld him in that condition; and, at the risk of
incurring the displeasure of his fellow-officers, he flew from the ranks, and, with his own hat, covered the haed of his unfortunate
father from the storm. Many eyes, it is said, were suffused with (1). In a letter by one of the victors, published in the Scots Magazine for April, 1746, this sentence occurs: "The moor was covered with blood; and our men, by killing the enemy, dabbling their feet in the blood, and splashing it about one another, looked like so many butchers." youthful lord.(1) The Earl of Kilmarnock, with other prisoners of distinction, was carried to London and imprisoned in the Tower. (2) A bill of indictment having been found against him, he was
brought to trial along with the Earl of Cromarty and Lord Balmerino, on Monday, the 28th of July, 1746, in Westminster-hall, which had
been fitted up with great magnificience for the occasion. Unusual pomp was also displayed in the assembling of the Judges, the Lord
High Steward, and the Peers, of whom an hundred and thirty-six were present. The "Rebel Lords," as they were called in the
newspapers and magazines of the time, were brought from the Tower in coaches,
alongside of which a strong military force marched as a guard. In the 1. See Chambers Rebellion. Another
anecdote, also honourable to the memory of this young nobleman, may be related. Nineteen Highland
officers, who had been severely wounded in the conflict, were afterwards found sheltered in the vicinity of Culloden House, and led
forth to be shot. One of them, named Fraser, though he received a ball, did not expire. The butt of a musket was then applied to his
head in order to despatch him, and he was left for dead on the ground. Soon after, Lord Boyd happened to pass the spot where he lay,
and, moved with compassion for the unhappy man, who still showed symptons of life, got him "conveyed to a secure place, where he 2. The news of the defeat of Prince
Charles and his followers, at Culloden, was received, it would appear, with much satisfaction in
Kilmarnock. In the Town Treasurer's Book is the following entry: 3. "The Chancellor [Hardwicke]
was Lord High Steward; but through a most comely personage with a fine voice, his behaviour was mean,
curiously searching for occasion to bow to the minister [Mr Pelham], that is no peer, and consequently applying to the other ministers, in
a manner, for their orders; and not even ready at the ceremonial. To the prisoners he was peevish; and instead of keeping up to the humane
dignity of the law of England, whose character it is to point out favour to the criminal, he crossed them, and almost scolded at any
offer they made towards defence." ---Walpole's Letters to Sir
Horace Mann. On the appointed day the court again
met, and the Lord High Steward (3 above). put the following question to each of the prisoners: "Have you
anything to offer why judgement of death should not pass against you? The Earl of Kilmarnock acknowledged the heinousness of the crime with
which he was charged, confessed his guilt, and threw himself upon the sympathy and
compassion of the court, whom he implored to intercede with his majesty in his behalf. He alluded to the unsullied character
of his ancestors; to the services rendered by his father in the support of the House of Hanover, and in the promotion of revolution
principles; and to his own adherence and fidelity to those principles up until the moment at which he had been seduced to join in the
Rebellion. He also alluded to the services of his eldest son in the cause of his Majesty; to the hatred of Popery and arbitrary power
which he has instilled into his mind; "and is it possible," he
asked, "that my endeavors in his education would have been successful, if
I had not myself been sincere in those principles. and an enemy to those measures which have involved me and my family in ruin? Had my
mind at that time been tainted with disloyalty and disaffection, I could not have dissembled so closely with my own family, but some
tincture would have devolved to my children." He then pleaded that
he had bought no arms, nor had he raised a single man for the cause of the Pretender; that, when engaged with the Rebels, he had not
unfrequently made himself useful to his Majesty's subjects, by assisting such persons as were sick or wounded among the prisoners
they had taken; that he seperated from his corps at the battle of Culloden, and surrendered himself when he might have made his
escape;(1) "but my lords," he concluded, "if all I have
offered is "The Sentence" Notwithstanding these seemingly sincere sentiments of contrition for his errors, the Earl of Kilmarnock unfortunately found no favour from the court. At the close of his trial the Lord High Steward made a speech to the prisoners, and concluded by pronouncing sentence in the following words: "The judgement of the law is, and this high court doth award, that you, William Earl of Kilmarnock, George Earl of Cromarty, and Arthur Lord Balmerino, and every one of you, return to the prison of the Tower from whence you came; from thence you must be drawn to the place of execution; when you come there, you must be hanged by the neck, but not until,you are dead, for you must be cut down alive; then your bowels must be taken out, and burnt before your faces; then your heads must be severed from your bodies; and your bodies must be divided each into four quarters, and these must be at the King's disposal. And God Almighty be merciful to your souls."(2) 1. His lordship afterwards acknowledged---and earnestly desired it might be published to the world---that his declaration was false; that he had no intention of surrendering; and that the party of the King's troops, towards whom he advanced, he had mistaken for Fitz- James Horse, with whom he intended to make his escape. ---See Foster's Account 2. In cases of high treason this
awful sentence is usually pronounced, but the most ignominious parts of it are generally
remitted to persons of high rank. Petitions containing statements
similar to those embodied in his speech at the trial were afterwards presented by the Earl of
Kilmarnock to the King, the Prince of Wales, and the Duke of Cumberland. A petition was also sent to government in his behalf by
the Town Council of Kilmarnock. His old family teacher, too, traveled all the way to London to intercede for him with persons of The appearance of the Earl at his
trial is thus described by the Honourable Horace Walpole, who was present: "Lord Kilmarnock is
tall and slender, with an extreme fine person; his behaviour a most just
mixture between dignity and submission; if in anything to be reprehended, a little affected, and his hair too exactly dressed for
a man in his situation; but when I say this it is not to find fault with him, but to show how little fault there is to be found." The
same authority states that "Lord Kilmarnock, with the greatest nobleness of soul, desired to have Lord Cromarty preferred to himself
for pardon, if there could be but one saved." 1. James, the sixth Duke of
Hamilton, also exerted himself to procure a pardon for the Earl. Walpole says: "Duke Hamilton, who has
never been at court, designs to kiss the King's hand, and ask Lord Kilmarnock's life. The King is much inclined to some mercy; but the
Duke [of Cumberland], who has not so much of a Caesar after a victory as in gaining it, is for the utmost severity. It was lately proposed
in the city to present him with the freedom of some company; one of the aldermen said aloud, "Then let it be one of the
Butchers!" Pitied by gentle hearts, Kilmarnock died. Johnson.
He died, as erring man should die, Byron. The Earl of Kilmarnock was attended
from the 7th August till within a few moments of his execution, by Mr James Foster, an eminent
dissenting clergyman, who published an interesting account of his behaviour after his sentence. From that work, which is before us,
this unfortunate nobleman appears to have been of a mild and benevolent disposition, and altogether guileless and ingenuous in
his confessions. He assured Mr foster "that, in the hours of his confinement and solitude, he had felt the crime of rebellion lie as a When asked by Mr Foster what could be
his motive for engaging in the Rebellion against his conscience, he said "that the true root of
all was his careless and dissolute life, by which he had reduced himself
to great and perplexing difficulties;(1) that the exigency of his affairs was in particular very pressing at the time of the Rebellion;
and that, besides the general hope he had of mending his fortune by the success of it, he was also tempted by another prospect of
retrieving his circunstances, if he followed the
Pretender's standard." On Mr Foster telling him "that by joining
rebels he had 1. Walpole, alluding, in one of his
letters, to the Earl's straitened circumstances, says: "I don't know whether I told you that the
man at the Tennis Court protests that he has known him [Lord Kilmarnock]
dine with the man that sells pamphlets at Storey's gate;
"and" says he, "he would often have been glad if I would have taken him
home to dinner." He was certainly so poor, that in one of his wife's
intercepted letters she tells him she has plagued their steward for a fortnight for money, and can get but three shillins." This is
surely exaggeration. According to accounts published at the time, the Earl been weaned from the world by the
soothing influence of religion; and when he did allude to the scenes of gaiety and pleasure in which he
had mingled, it was apparently with no desire to taste again their deluding joys, but to point out the rock on which he had been wrecked
and ruined. When told that the warrant for his execution had come, and that the day fixed was the 18th, he evinced almost no
perturbation of mind; but seemed more concerned for the consequences of death than for the thing itself, of which, he said, "he had no
great reason to be terrified; for that the stroke appeared to be scarce so A minute detail of all the solemn and
appalling circumstances that would attend his execution was given him by General Williamson, to
which he listened without betraying any inward emotion. Among other things, he was informed that the coffin would be in a mourning
hearse, close to the scaffold, so that when the head was struck off it would be ready to receive it; to which his lordhip said, that he
thought it would be better for the coffin to be placed upon the scaffold, for, by that means, the body would be sooner removed out of
sight. He was also told that the executioner was not only expert, but "I now come," says Mr Foster, "to the conclusion of this dismal scene---his behaviour on the day of his execution. I attended him in the morning about eight o'clock, and found him in a most calm and happy temper, without any disturbance or confusion of mind, and with apparent marks of ease and serenity in his aspect......I had observed to him, that to affect to brave death, when he justly suffered for his crimes, could have no show of true decorum in it---and that, to manifest no concern at all, where the consequence was so awful and the stake infinite, was in some degree unbecoming even in the best of men---that not to fear at all where there was any great reason to fear, was altogether as absurd as to be extremely dejected and pusillanimous where there was ground for hope---and that true penitence was always humble and cautious, and not bold and arrogant. He assented to all this, and told me
further, that for a man who had led a dissolute life, and yet believed the consequences of death, to
put on such an air of daringness and absolute intrepidity, must argue him either to be very stupid or very impious...... He continued
all the morning of his execution in the same uniform temper, unruffled, and without any sudden vicissitudes and starts of passion. This
remarkably appeared, when soon after I had, at his own desire, made a short prayer with him, General Williamson came to inform him that the
sheriffs waited for the prisoners. At receiving this awful summons to After passing a short time in
conversation with Balmerino, and in prayer with Mr Foster and others, "Lord Kilmarnock took his last
farewell of the gentlemen who attended him in a very affectionate manner, and went out of the room, preceded by the sheriffs and
accompanied by his friends. And I am informed" continues Mr Foster,
"of the following particular by Mr Home, that as he was stepping
into the scaffold, notwithstanding the great pains he had taken to What remains to be told of this
mournful scene we will give in the words of Mr Jameson, another Presbyterian minister, who attended him
till the last moment: "My lord's hair having been dressed in a bag,
it took some time to undo it, and put it up in his cap. The tucking his shirt under the waistcoat, that it might not obstruct the blow,
was the occasion of some further small delay. But as soon as these preliminaries were adjusted, his lordship gave the executioner notice
what should be the signal, took out a paper containing the heads of his devetion, went forward to his last stage, and decently knelt down 1. This house was about thirty
yards from the scaffold. Then he was told that the neck of his
waistcoat was in the way, upon which he rose up, and with the help of one of his friends--- Mr Walk-
inshaw of Scotston---had taken it off. This done, and the neck made bare to the shoulder, he again knelt down as before. And what
sufficiently shows that he enjoyed full presence of mind to the last, Mr Home's servant, who held the cloth to receive the head, heard him
direct the executioner that in two minutes he would give the signal. That dreadful interval, to his friends, who were then upon the rack,
appeared much longer, but those who measured found it just about two minutes. This time he spent in most fervent devotion, as appeared by
the motion of his hands, and now and then of his head; having then Mr Walkinshaw of Scotston, as he is
called in the above paragraph, was Colonel John Walkinshaw Craufurd of Craufurdland, in his
parish. He was on terms of closest intimacy with the Earl, and besides holding the cloth to receive his head, he performed the last
melancholy duty of a friend by getting him interred. For this service, which was purely that of friendship, he was put to the
bottom of the army list. He afterwards rose to the rank of Major, and Soon after the Earl's death, his eldest son, Lord Boyd, who was then residing in Kilmarnock, where the family was much respected,(1)transmitted the following letter to the Colonel, at Scarborough, thanking him in feeling terms for his attention to his unfortunate father. The original MS. is in the possession of W.H. Craufurd, Esq. of Craufurdland: "My dear John, I had yours last post, and I don't know in what words to express how much I am obliged to you for doing the last duties to my unfortunate father; you knew him perfectly well, that he was the best of friends, the most affectionate husband, and the tenderest parent. Poor Lady Kilmarnock bears her loss much better than I could have imagined; but it was entirely owing to her being prepared several days before she got the melancholy accounts of it. I shall be here for some time, as I have a good deal of business to do in this country; so I shall be extremely glad to see you as soon as possible. I am, my dear John, your sincere friend and obedient humble servant, "Kilmarnock [House], August 27, 1746." "Boyd. 1. As somewhat illustrative of this respect, the following tradittionary anecdote may be related: A flying stationer came to the burgh and began to hawk a paper containing an account of the Earl's execution; but the inhabitants, notwithstanding their disapproval of the part which he had taken in the Rebellion, felt indignant at hearing his name bawled aloud through the streets in connection with a subject so ignominous, and, rising in a mass, they mobbed the poor hawker to such a degree, that, for the preservation of his life, he was forced to hasten out of the burgh. According to a declaration made by the Earl, during his confinement, to his solicitor, Mr Ross, and to the Reverand and Honourable Mr. Home, Lady Kilmarnock had no hand in exciting him to join in the Rebellion, but on the contrary had endeavoured to dissuade him from taking part in such a course. After his death she brooded in deepest melancholy over his fate. In a secluded avenue, called "The Lady's Walk," which we have already noticed, and part of which yet remains in the vicinity of Kilmarnock House, she was wont to wander alone, with downcast looks, and pour forth the sorrows of her heart. She died of grief at Kilmarnock, 16th September, 1747. Lord Kilmarnock, while in prison, wrote a letter to his eldest son, and another to his factor, Boyd Paterson, Esq. The latter of these is in the possession of Mr Paterson's great-grandson, M.T. Paterson, Esq., who has kindly permitted us to copy it. In a striking manner it exhibits the sterling honesty of the writer; and, on that account, we insert it in our pages, convinced that it will be perused with considerable interest. It is as follows: "Sir,---I have
commended to your care the enclosed packet to be delivered to my wife, in the manner your good sense shall dictate to
you will be least shocking to her. Let her be prepared for it as much by degrees and with great tenderness as the nature of the thing will
admit of. The entire dependence I have all my life had the most just reason to have on your integrity and friendship to my wife and
family, as well as to myself, makes me desire that the enclosed papers may come to my wife through my hands, in confidence that you
will take all pains to comfort her and relieve the grief I know she You will peruse the State before you
deliver it to her, and you will observe that there is a fund of hers I don't mention, that of 500
Scots a year as the interest of my mother-in law's portion, in the Countess of Errol's hands, with I believe a considerable arrear upon
it; which as I have ordered a copy of all these papers to that Countess, I did not care put in. There is another thing, a good deal
of moment, which I mention only to you, because, if it could be taken away without noise it would be better; but if it is pushed, it
will be necessary to defend it: that a bond which you know Mr Kerr, director to the chancery, has of me for a considerable sum of money,
with many years interest on it, which was almost all play debt. I don't think I ever had fifty pounds of the half of it, of Mr Kerr's
money, and I'm sure I never had a hundred, which however I have put "Beside my personal debts
mentioned in general and particular in the State, there is one for which I am liable in justice, if it is not
paid, owing to poor people who gave their work for it by my orders. It was at Elgin in Murray, the Regiment I commander wanted shoes. I
commissioned something about seventy pair of shoes and brogues, which might come to 3 shillngs or three shillings and sixpence each, one
with the other. The magistrates divided them among the shoemakers of the town and country, and each shoemaker furnished his proportion. I
drew on the town, for the price, out of the composition laid on them, but I was afterwards told at Inverness that, it was believed, the
composition was otherwise applied, and the poor shoemakers not paid. As these poor people wrought by my orders, it will be a great ease to "Tower of London, August 16, 1746." "Kilmarnock" NOTE: Use this data as a finding tool, just as you would any other secondary source. When you find the name of an ancestor listed, confirm the facts in original sources.
|
History
Panoramic View of Kilmarnock (Dean Castle)
KILMARNOCK, SCOTLAND by ARCHIBALD M'KAY 1864
"Kilmarnock House" and other Olden views of Dean (Kilmarnock) Castle
The Origins of Kilmarnock, Scotland
Dean Castle (Kilmarnock) Visitor's Page
The
Battle of Culloden
Main Descent of the Boyd family
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright
2001- 2007 ©
Clan
Boyd Society International. All Rights Reserved. Web Site
Do not duplicate in any form without permission of
Clan
Boyd Society International. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||